Is it true jews use the circumcision dead skin for breakfast?

No.





Reported.Is it true jews use the circumcision dead skin for breakfast?
Naw... they have a recepticle handy to spit it out.





http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brit_milah





It's all rather disgusting to me... whether it be a Mohel or a Doctor doing the work...Is it true jews use the circumcision dead skin for breakfast?
actually, since a human is an 'unclean animal', Jews aren't allowed to eat human flesh. Right?





So.....no, I guess, would be the answer.
Problem with Jewish people? Circumcision is a common practice and not just with them. Your comments about breakfast define you more than they do the ones you speak of.
i don't see how that'd be any more bizarre than mutilating a child's genitals at birth.


if their religion condoned it, they'd be able to eat the whole damn kid.
It's called the FORESKIN not circumcision skin.


And no they don't.





-Connor
not true disgusting and insulting to Jews
No.





The darkness within you creates a stench like days old garbage.
is it true that you'll graduate grade school this year finally?
LOL!
thats funny... NOT
No, but I did just read of a slightly more disturbing practice called ';Metzitzah b'peh'; or 'suction by mouth.'





';After removing the foreskin, the mohel sucks out the blood from the wound to clean it. The mohel spits the blood into a receptacle provided. Afterwards the circumcised penis is bandaged, and the brit is considered complete. Because the practice may spread diseases to the babies from the mohel's mouth (such as herpes), most mohelim ensure that their mouths are sanitized and washed out by rinsing with alcohol to disinfect the mouth. However, because alcohol may not kill a virus such as herpes, washing the mouth with alcohol alone is not regarded as a sufficient protective measure.





Metzitzah b'peh was implicated in the transfer of herpes from mohelim to eight Israeli infants, one of whom suffered brain damage. When three New York City infants contracted herpes after metzizah b'peh by one mohel and one of them died, New York authorities took out a restraining order against the mohel requiring use of a sterile glass tube, or pipette. However, the mohel's attorney argued that the New York Department of Health had not supplied conclusive medical evidence linking his client with the disease. In September 2005, the city withdrew the restraining order and turned the matter over to a chasidic rabbinical court. In February 2006, after the rabbinical court had not met a deadline of 1 December 2005 for a decision on this case, Dr. Thomas Frieden, the Health Commissioner of New York City, wrote, ';There exists no reasonable doubt that 鈥榤etzitzah b'peh鈥?can and has caused neonatal herpes infection.鈥he Health Department recommends that infants being circumcised not undergo metzitzah b'peh.'; In May 2006, the Department of Health for New York State, issued a protocol for the performance of metzitzah b'peh. Dr. Antonia C. Novello, Commissioner of Health for New York State, together with a board of rabbis and doctors, worked, she said, to ';allow the practice of metzizah b'peh to continue while still meeting the Department of Health's responsibility to protect the public health.';
No... lampshades